Gateway comparison
Chinese LLM gateway vs OpenRouter
OpenRouter-style gateways are broad. GPTokens is positioned for teams whose shortlist is primarily Chinese LLM routes and who want dedicated model comparison pages.
Route shortlist
Benchmark comparison
| Model | Total /100 | Extraction | Instructions | Math | Tools | Fully correct | Tokens | Cost (USD) | CPS ($/100 points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLM 5.2glm-5.2 | 99.58 | 98.33 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 59/60 | 104,610 | $0.165644 | $0.166337 |
DeepSeek v4 Prodeepseek-v4-pro | 99.00 | 98.33 | 98.67 | 99.00 | 100.00 | 57/60 | 116,757 | $0.145106 | $0.146572 |
Qwen 3.7 Plusqwen3.7-plus | 92.72 | 99.56 | 100.00 | 72.00 | 99.33 | 52/60 | 122,334 | $0.116596 | $0.125748 |
BenchLocal V3.2 · Original 27 models: 2 October 2026; three full-suite supplements: 15 October 2026 · 60 tasks per model. Total = mean of the four category scores. The original models retain 45 V3 tasks and 15 revised tool tasks; the three additional model IDs each completed all 60 identical tasks. Near-ceiling scores do not establish general capability; V3 scores are not directly comparable. CPS = Cost per Score; shown as USD per 100 score points: retained execution cost ÷ unrounded total score × 100. Free models are shown at $0. Paid-model costs are historical charges, excluding failed requests and discarded retests.
Decision guide
Recommended route
Use GPTokens when Chinese LLM coverage, benchmark notes, and one GPTokens workspace are more important than maximum global model breadth.
Best fit for GPTokens
GPTokens is strongest when you are evaluating DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax, MiMo, and similar Chinese LLM routes.
Decision rule
Compare live model coverage, pricing, support, latency, billing workflow, and fallback needs before choosing a gateway.
Related pages